ITO Vs Shri Sunil Govind Agre (ITAT Mumbai) During the course of assessment proceedings, the AO called for information u/s 133(6) from the above two parties in order to verify the genuineness of transactions. However, the notices sent by him could not be served and these were returned un-served by the postal authorities with the […]
IBM India Pvt. Ltd. Vs ACIT (ITAT Bangalore) It has been submitted by Ld.Counsel that as a consequence of APA entered into by assessee, income was increased vis-a-vis original computation at page 322. Referring to revised computation at page 328 of paper book volume 1, he submitted that, incremental increase in the income is Rs.7,74,2 […]
Bureau Veritas Consumer Products Services (India) Private Limited Vs ACIT (ITAT Delhi) ITAT held that It is true that the assessee has paid rebate/discount to its overseas AEs. It is equally true that such arrangement has been done through Master Service Agreements (‘MSA’) with various overseas companies (sample JC Penny ) for providing testing and […]
ITO Vs Manoj Vashudev Wadhwa (ITAT Mumbai) In ACIT v. Vireet Investment (P.) Ltd. 165 ITD 27 (Del) (SB) it is held by the Special Bench of the Tribunal that only those investments are to be considered for computing average value of investment which yielded exempt income during the year. We are of the considered […]
Economic Laws Practice Vs CIT (Appeals) (ITAT Mumbai) ITAT held that for the purpose of Computation of interest on late payment of TDS under section 201(1A), the expression month is to be interpreted as period of 30 days and not British calendar. Gujarat High Court in the case of Arvind Textile Mills, considered the definition […]
Chowdry Associates Vs ACIT (ITAT Delhi) From the entirety of the events, we find that in the assessment year 2014-15, the assessee had made purchases in the middle or last week of June 2013 through M/s Anand Rathi Commodities Ltd. and M/s Philips Commodities Pvt. Ltd. The NSEL failed to fulfill its commitments and ultimately […]
Due to increased groupism in the Bar Councils, on many occasions this Council has been receiving complaints and a very anomalous situation arises some times. Because of some impractical rule of some states, the situation in some of the State Bar Council leads to unwanted groupism, resulting in unhealthy atmosphere and inefficient functioning of the State Bar Councils.
Sh. Sushil Ansal Vs. Ashok Tripathi (Delhi NCLAT) (i) Respondent Nos. 1 and 2 can no more claim to be allottees of a Real Estate Project after issuance of Recovery Certificate dated 10th August, 2019 by ‘UP RERA’ directing recovery of Rs.73,35,686.43/- due thereunder as arrears of land revenue by the Competent Authority. On their […]
The assessment shall be made as per the following procedure, namely:— (i) the National e-Assessment Centre shall serve a notice on the assessee under sub-section (2) of section 143, specifying the issues for selection of his case for assessment;
National e-assessment Centre shall assign the case selected for the purposes of e-assessment under this Scheme to a specific assessment unit in any one Regional e-assessment Centre through an automated allocation system;
