Case Law Details
Case Name : Economic Laws Practice Vs CIT (Appeals) (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Courts :
ITAT Mumbai
Become a Premium member to Download.
If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored
Economic Laws Practice Vs CIT (Appeals) (ITAT Mumbai)
ITAT held that for the purpose of Computation of interest on late payment of TDS under section 201(1A), the expression month is to be interpreted as period of 30 days and not British calendar.
Gujarat High Court in the case of Arvind Textile Mills, considered the definition of month in the context of Section 201(1A) of the Act and held that Section 244A(1) is analogous to provisions of Section 201(1A)(ii) read with Rule 11
Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.
Sponsored
Kindly Refer to
Privacy Policy &
Complete Terms of Use and Disclaimer.