Bengal Beverages Private Limited Vs Commissioner of CGST & CX (CESTAT Kolkata) Briefly stated, the facts of the case are that the Appellant is engaged in the manufacture and clearance of Aerated water and Fruit based drinks (in short ‘final products’) classifiable under Chapter- 22 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 on payment of […]
When an assessment framed by the ld. AO is unsustainable in the eyes of law, the said invalid and illegal order cannot be subject matter of section 263 proceedings.
Voxco Pigments And Chemicals Pvt Limited Vs C.C.E. & S.T. (CESTAT AHMEDABAD) There is no dispute that the appellant had filed the refund claim on 01/06/2017 for an amount of Rs. 12,25,023/-. Thereafter, on the audit query, the appellant had decided to reduce the refund claim and, therefore, withdrew the earlier claimed and thereafter claim […]
Kishor Ramesh Sohoni Vs Union of India & Ors (Bombay High Court) Petitioner asks is for a direction to the RBI to replace the old currency notes since they were all along in custody of the police with valid current tender. HC exercises its equitable discretionary jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India […]
Explore ITAT Delhi’s decision in Amar Chand Garg vs. ACIT. Disallowance of annual mixed-use charges for commercial use. Details of the case and verdict.
It was held that there cannot be situation where two Assessing Officer would have simultaneous jurisdiction over the assessee. Accordingly, it was held that the Tribunal had rightly held that the issuance of notice under Section 148 (1) of the said Act by the non-jurisdictional Assessing Officer was without jurisdiction.
Central Government hereby approves ‘Sri Shankara Cancer Foundation, Bangalore (PAN: AAHTS5593F)’under the category of ‘University, College or other institution’for Scientific Research for the purposes of clause (ii) of sub-section (1) of section 35 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 read with rules 5C and 5E of the Income-tax Rules, 1962.
Supreme Court M/s. Jai Balaji Industries Vs. D.K. Mohanty & Anr. [Civil Appeal No. 5899 of 2021 with 5904 of 2021] The Supreme Court (SC) observed that an operational creditor (OC) cannot use the Code for extraneous considerations or as a substitute for debt enforcement procedures; and the object of the Code is to allow […]
Export Credit Guarantee Corporation of India (ECGC) has clarified that the coverage on export transactions to Russia has not been withdrawn. It has been mentioned in various media reports that ECGC has withdrawn its cover on the export transactions to Russia vide its circular dated 25.02.2022; this is factually incorrect.
Gopala Krishna Mootha Vs State Govt of NCT of Delhi & Anr (Delhi High Court) In a Complaint under Section 138 read with Section 142 of the NI Act a person cannot avoid liability by merely stating that owing to his age he is unable to manage the affairs of the company It is not […]
