Google India Private Limited Vs DCIT (ITAT Bangalore) ITAT held that assessee would be entitled to deduction of employees’ contribution to PF and ESI provided that the payments were made prior to the due date of filing of the return of income u/s 139(1) of the I.T.Act. It was further held by the ITAT that […]
Ems Projects Pvt. Ltd. Vs Commissioner Of CGST (Gujarat High Court) It is not in dispute that one year period has elapsed since GST Electronic credit ledger came to be blocked. Rule 86A of Central Goods and Services Tax Rules, 2017 empowers the authority to block the electronic credit ledger if the authority has reason […]
Appeal by Anantpur Kalpana against CIT(A) order on demonetized notes. Cash deposits treated as unexplained credits. Learn about double taxation issues
Delhi High Court ruling on Budweiser trademark infringement. Defendants restrained from using recycled Budweiser bottles for BLACK FORT and POWER COOL beers.
Learned PCIT has exceeded her jurisdiction in examining issues other than the issues which is subject matter of limited scrutiny assessment proceedings before the Assessing Officer.
Whether the Ministry has taken cognisance of NCLTs taking note of disproportionate haircuts by lenders to companies using the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) to settle large debts
BSE has vide Notice No. 20220326-1 Dated 26 Mar 2022 revised its Annual Listing Fees to be paid by the listed entities for listing of its securities on the Exchange and vide Notice No. 20220326-2 Dated 26 Mar 2022 it has revised its Annual Listing Fees to be paid by the listed entities for listing […]
Government has decided to foreclose Revised Transport and Marketing Assistance (TMA) for Specified Agriculture Products Scheme to revamp, redesign and refocus it better for better outcomes. As such, the notification dated 9th September 2021 stands withdrawn. MINISTRY OF COMMERCE (Department of Commerce) NOTIFICATION New Delhi, the 25th March, 2022 No. 17/2/2021 -EP (Agr i.IV).— The […]
CESTAT finds that in the present case the Revenue has raised the Service tax demand merely on the ground of investigation conducted by the Income Tax Authorities. We find that demand cannot be raised merely on the basis of assessment made by the Income Tax Authorities.
ACIT Vs Ankur Foundation P. Ltd (ITAT Chennai) The assessee claimed bad-debt of Rs.20 Lacs written-off against Mr. K.M.Pitchai. The same was held to be not allowable under any of the provisions. During appellate proceedings, it was explained that the assessee paid land advance of Rs.25 Lacs to Mr. Pitchaiin AY 2006-07. Since Mr. Pitchai […]
