1. Whether in the facts and circumstances of the case, the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal has not acted illegally and perversely in making observations with regard to grant of exemption under section 10(23C)(vi) when the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal has no jurisdiction to decide any application/appeal arising out of order passed either granting or rejecting exemption under section 10(23C)(vi) of the Act by the competent authority ?
Facts on record go to show that on 21-3-2014 when the petitioners were carrying a sum of Rs. 30 lakhs in New Delhi purportedly having received it as certain sale proceeds, the authorities of the Income Tax Department at New Delhi seized the amount and thereafter when the amount was not released and no action was taken for a period of about two years, this writ petition has been filed.
These are appeals filed by the assessee-firm directed against the common order of the Commissioner (Appeals), Gulbarga, dated 29-1-2016 for the assessment years 2011-12 and 2012-13. Since common issue is involved in both the appeals, we proceed to dispose of the same by this common order.
These cross appeals by the Revenue and by the assessee are directed against the order of the Commissioner (Appeals)-4,Chenaai dated 8-2-2016.
This appeal of the assessee is directed against the order of the Commissioner (Appeals)-4, Chennai dated 19-8-2016 pertaining to assessment year 2012-13. 2. The only grievance in this appeal of assessee is non-granting of exemption under section 54 of the Act in respect of sale of the residential property.
Pr. CIT Vs Dr. Amrik Singh Basra (Punjab & Haryana High Court) After considering the relevant statutory provisions and the case law, the following conclusions were drawn :– “(1) Perusal of the JDA dated 25-2-2007 read with sale deeds dated 2-3-2007 and 25-4-2007 in respect of 3.08 acres and 4.62 acres respectively would reveal that […]
PRESENTATION PLAN :- WHY GST : BENEFITS, EXISTING INDIRECT TAX STRUCTURE, FEATURES OF CONSTITUTION AMENDMENT ACT, GST COUNCIL, MAIN FEATURES OF GST LAW, GSTN, ROLE OF CBEC, WAY FORWARD
It is clarified that Aadhaar/UID numbers can be used as an optional document for the purposes of seeking the identity of the parents and need not he considered a mandatory requirement. Further, Aadhaar/UID number, if obtained, should have the consent of the concerned person for the aforesaid purposes.
The Court finds that the standard excuse that the Department is putting forth in all such applications for condonation of delay in re-filing the appeal is two-fold. The first is regarding the budgetary constraints of the Departmen
UDAN (Ude Desh ka Aam Naagrik) program is designed to jump-start the regional aviation market by improving profitability of under-developed regional routes.
