Dive into the dispute of Acmechem Ltd vs Commissioner of Customs (CESTAT Mumbai). Explore challenges to value rejection, breaches of natural justice, and a crucial assessment analysis.
Lonsen Kiri Chemical Industries Limited Vs Commissioner of Central Excise & ST (CESTAT Ahmedabad) In the present case, the assessee being 100% EOU, imported goods exempted under Notification No. 50/2003-Cus. There is no dispute about the intention of the said goods to be used in the manufacture of final product in the 100% EOU unit […]
HC held that this Court while exercising jurisdiction under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act cannot be called upon to reexamine the facts or to re-appreciate the tenor and ambit of the document which was placed before the Assessing Officer, CITA and more importantly the Tribunal has noted that the assessee has failed to establish the reimbursement which was pleaded by producing document despite opportunity being given at the appellate stage.
Calcutta High Court quashes IT notice against Tinplate Company, citing change of opinion in assessing officer approach. Detailed analysis and implications.
2.1. KYC records of all existing clients (who have used Aadhaar as an OVD) shall be validated within a period of 180 days from August 01, 2022. 2.2. The validation of all KYC records (new and existing) shall commence from August 01, 2022.
SEBI decided to reduce the time taken for allotment and listing of units of privately placed Infrastructure Investment Trust (InvIT)
After consultation with stakeholders, it has been decided to provide an additional option to individual investors to apply in public issues of units of REITs with a facility to block funds through Unified Payments Interface (UPI) mechanism for application value upto Rs. 5 Lac.
Read about the ITAT Ahmedabad’s ruling in ITO vs. Yagnesh Dayabhai Vyas, where disallowance under Section 40(a)(ia) was deemed unjust when TDS was duly deducted and paid before the return filing deadline.
G. V. N. Hospitals Vs ACIT (ITAT Chennai) In the present case, admittedly there is difference in net profit as shown in ITR and tax audit report and same has not been satisfactorily explained by the assessee. The Assessing Officer, after considering relevant facts has rightly made additions towards difference in net profit. The learned […]
ACIT Vs GP Global Energy Pvt. Ltd. (ITAT Delhi) In so far as bench marking the international transactions using customs data is concerned we sustain the order of the Ld. CIT(Appeals) as the Ld. CIT(A) observed that the Chennai Bench of the Tribunal in the case of Coastal Energy Pvt. Ltd. Vs. ACIT (supra) held […]
