In the present case, entry by the culprits was by removal of roof sheet which cannot be done without use of force. Hence, it would be a case of violent entry for committing theft/burglary. It means that removal of roof sheets by culprits is considered as forceful entry into premises and hence comes under definition of theft or burglary based on the circumstances of the case and hence insurance company is liable for payment of claim.
SC held that denying the appellant’s claim on account of upholding an unfavourable interpretation of an ambiguous term would entail the respondent not performing its duties as a government company.
IRDA modifies definition of Critical Illnesses for Health Insurance Products. Stay updated with the latest changes in the guidelines.
Learn about adhering to the timelines of award settlement as per Rule 17(6) of Insurance Ombudsman Rules, 2017. Find out why it’s important for insurers to comply with these guidelines.
Discover the important facts about all-risk insurance policies and understand the different types of coverage they offer.
Discover how to opt out from a group insurance policy and secure your health coverage even when changing jobs.
Discover when ITR filing is mandatory in various situations, such as high expenditure on electricity bill or foreign travel.
Understand the tax implications of bonus shares in deemed dividends. Explore the case of PCIT vs. Dr. Ranjan Pai and its impact on shareholders.
Understand the provisions of inspection, search, seizure & arrest under GST. Learn about the changes and amendments in the GST Act,2017.
NCLAT held that a fresh resolution plan cannot be considered by committee of creditors of AMW Autocomponent Limited (CoC).
