It is brought to the notice of this Court that Aadhar Cards are not being issued to sex workers as they were unable to produce proof of their residence. We had issued notice to UIDAI and sought its suggestions in respect of waiving the requirement of proof of residence for the sex workers, to enable them to get an identity by the issuance of Aadhar cards.
Kotak Mahindra Bank Limited Vs A. Balakrishnan (Supreme Court) Facts- The present appeal challenges the judgment and order passed by NCLAT, thereby allowing the appeal filed by the respondent no. 1 – Director and reversing the order passed by NCLT, whereby the application filed by the appellant under Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 was […]
Jay Chemical Industries Ltd. Vs DCIT/ACIT (ITAT Ahmedabad) Facts- Primarily three issues involved in these cross appeals are – (i) relating to transfer pricing adjustment made on account of determination of Arm’s Length Price of the reimbursement made by the assessee to its Associate Enterprise (AE) in lieu of cost sharing agreement entered into with […]
We hold that in absence of any incriminating material found during the course of search with respect to the impugned transaction, the AO did not have any power to make the impugned addition.
Seabird Marine Services Pvt Ltd Vs C.C.E. & S.T. (CESTAT Ahmedabad) Facts- These appeals are filed by the M/s Seabird Marine Services Pvt. Ltd., Mundra International Container Terminal Pvt. Ltd., Allcargo Logistic Ltd., and Honeycomb Logistics Pvt. Ltd. against demand of Service Tax on “Storage and Warehousing services” allegedly provided by the appellant’s, demand of […]
CIT (E) was not right in passing the impugned revisionary order u/s.263 of the Act in violation of principles of natural justice alleging the assessment order as erroneous and prejudicial to the interest of the revenue and directing the AO to redo the assessment without making an enquiry himself.
DCIT (Exemption) Vs Yug Nirman Yojna Vistar Trust (ITAT Delhi) Facts- The assessee is a trust, registered u/s 12A of Income Tax Act. Perusal of assessment order dated 29.12.2016 passed by the Assessing Officer u/s 143(3) of Income Tax Act; shows that registration u/s 12A was granted to the assessee by order dated 01.05.2009 of […]
Where it was discernible from record that the A.O has applied his mind to the issue in question, the ld. CIT cannot invoke section 263 of the Act merely because he has different opinion.
Held that objections of the assessee on reopening of assessment by the AO in the assessment order, these objections were never disposed off in terms of the decision of Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of GKN Driveshafts (India) Ltd. Vs. ITO [259 ITR 19].
GE India Business Services Pvt. Vs DC/ACIT IT (ITAT Delhi) Facts- The assessee company GE India Business Services Pvt. Ltd. is set up as a captive service provider to provide offshore outsourcing services primarily to GE entities/ business worldwide. The primary activity in which Assessee Company specializes is to render IT Enabled Services (“ITES”) and […]
