CESTAT Mumbai held that as appellant had not outsourced services to the overseas entity, it cannot be said that services provided by overseas entity should be taxed under Business Support Service.
CESTAT Chennai held that activity of loading cement, transporting to the godown and unloading the same is covered within the scope of Cargo Handling Service. Accordingly, service tax demand sustained.
Karnataka High Court provided directions/ guidelines for calculation of tax difference on contract value in respect of works contracts executed prior to 01.07.2017 under Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003 and completed after introduction of GST i.e. after 01.07.2017
ITAT Kolkata held that amount meant to be transferred to reserve fund, as per section 45-IC of the RBI Act, very well falls in the definition of income of the assessee and accordingly, such amount is to be included for the purpose of computation of income under the Income Tax Act.
NCLAT Delhi held that an appeal under the Companies Act, 2013 would be available to a ‘person’ who is either a ‘Member’ of the Company or a ‘Creditor’ or a ‘Director’. Since, appellant is none of these, appeal before NCLT is not maintainable.
ITAT Ahmedabad held that addition on account of deemed dividend as per section 2(22)(e) of the Act unsustainable in the hands of non-shareholders.
ITAT Mumbai held that addition towards bogus purchases unsustainable if the alleged bogus purchases show gross profit higher than the regular gross profit.
ITAT Surat held that deduction under section 54B duly allowable in case the nature of land was converted from agriculture to non-agriculture purpose just before transfer of land.
ITAT Mumbai held that that the joint ownership of the property would not stand in the way of claiming exemption under Section 54F of the Income Tax Act.
ITAT Mumbai held that deduction u/s 80IB of the Income Tax Act, in respect of increased business income due to addition on account of concealed production, is not allowable.
