These non-PAN cases have been pushed by Systems to respective Pr. CCIT/Pr. CIT based on address. Considering the time involved in allotting PAN in such non-PAN cases and other technical issues involved in generating notices through the system, the following instructions are being issued for handling of such non-PAN cases:
The Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) deferred the Tax Audit Clause 30C and 44 till 31st Mar 2022 due to COVID-19. F.No. 370142/9/2018-TPL Government of India Ministry of Finance Department of Revenue Central Board of Direct Taxes TPL Division New Delhi **** Circular No. 05/2021, Dated 25th March, 2021 Order under section 119 of […]
Delhi HC stays proceedings in Ankit Bindal’s case, citing vague summons seeking self-incriminating material. Next hearing on 12/04/2021.
Vrinda Sharad Bal Vs ITO (Bombay High Court) The Bombay high court recently held that income tax (I-T) officers cannot adjust the refunds due to taxpayers against outstanding demands in excess of the limits laid down in instructions, circulars and guidelines issued by the Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT). he I-T returns for the […]
Quantum Coal Energy (P) Ltd. Vs Commissioner, Office of the Commissioner of Customs (Madras High Court) 1. Canon effect – SCNs being quashed since an officer who did assessment can only do re-assessment. 2. SCN quashed on the basis of Honorable SC Canon Ruling by Madras High Court in WP 10186 of 2014 vide order […]
Chartered Accountants Association filed writ against Indian Bank for not allotting Statutory Audit for Financial Year 2020-21 to erstwhile Allahabad bank auditors. RBI is been made respondent to the writ.
Section 46 would facilitate pre-arrival processing and assessment of Bills of Entry (BE) by mandating their advance filing thus leading to significant decrease in the Customs clearance time.
Commissioner of Commercial Taxes & Anr. Vs Ramco Cements Ltd.Etc. (Supreme Court of India) 1. It is held that the respondents are liable to issue `C’ Forms in respect of the natural gas purchased by the petitioner from the Oil Companies in Gujarat and used in the generation or distribution of electricity at its power […]
Toyota Kirloskar Motor (P) Ltd. Vs ITO (Karnataka High Court) The Supreme Court in SHOORJI VALLABH DAS supra has held that income tax is a levy on income and the Act takes into account two points of time at which the liability to tax is attracted i.e., accrual of income or its receipt but substance […]
ACIT Vs Gajalaxmi Steel Pvt. Ltd. (ITAT Pune) There is no dispute on the fact that the Assessing Officer made addition based on the estimation with reference to the consumption of electricity. the Assessing Officer had made the addition of Rs 7,65,23,877 on the basis of wrong presumption/ assumptions. I find it quite baffling that […]
