Bright line test is not an appropriate yardstick for determining existence of an international transaction for calculating arms length price.
Enhancement u/s 251 (1) (a) is prohibited on the issues which have not at all been considered by AO during assessment proceedings, therefore, CIT (A) had exceeded his jurisdiction in enhancing the income of assessee by considering the new sources of income not at all considered by AO.
Amount received by assessee from ‘HUF’, being its member, was a capital receipt in his hands and was not exigible to income tax as in case of individual, the HUF has not been included in the definition of relative in explanation to section 56(2) (vii) as it was not so required because in case of HUF,
After much success of One day workshop conducted by us across India, we are happy to announce Online GST workshop for effective GST Audit and Annual Return. The workshop would cover clause wise clause detailed Analysis for Form GSTR 9, GSTR 9C along with GST Audit tool for GST Health Check-up. Online Workshop Coverage Legal […]
The powers of arrest under Section 69 of the Act, 2017 are to be exercised with lot of care and circumspection. Prosecution should normally be launched only after the adjudication is completed.
Detection of fake invoices case with wrongful availment of Rs. 39 Crore Input Tax Credit and Rs 350 crore taxable value involving multiple fake/bogus firms. In a joint operation of Anti Evasion Wing and the Amritsar Division of CGST Commissionerate, Jalandhar, a case of fake invoices against 7 firms has been booked, initially valued at […]
Exposure Draft of the Accounting Standards for Local Bodies (ASLBs) 13, ‘Leases’ for public comments ICAI/TD/CPF&ASLB/2019-20 , Dated: August 8, 2019 Dear Sir/Madam, Sub: Exposure Draft of the Accounting Standards for Local Bodies (ASLBs) 13, ‘Leases‘ for comments. At the outset, we would like to inform you that during the current Council Year 2019-20, a […]
Board has earlier issued above referred SOPs/Instruction/Internal Guidance Note regarding handling of cases related to demonetisation. In continuation of the same, a Verification Checklist-cash deposits is enclosed herewith for providing assistance to AOs for verification of cash deposits and framing of assessment in demonetisation related
AO was not justified in adding the entire suppressed receipts after rejection of books of accounts while making assessment u/s 153A as CIT(A) was fair enough to apply 2% of net profit rate on the alleged suppressed receipts by taking basis of net profit rate disclosed by the assessee for various assessment years which ranges from 0.5% to 2.05%.
After notification of the ITR forms various queries have been raised by the stakeholders in respect of filling-up of the ITR forms. In order to address such queries, following clarifications are issued. —
