ITAT states that, anyhow disallowing 10% of the expenditure on the ground that profit leakage has to be plugged cannot be supported. Keeping in view the facts and circumstances of the case, some disallowance of a random amount of 5 lakhs, in our view, would meet the end of justice. In the result, the balance disallowance is deleted and the appeal of the assessee is allowed in part.
ACIT Vs Volvo Auto (India) Private Limited (ITAT Delhi) The issue under consideration is whether CIT(A)is correct in deleting the addition made on application of CUP method for determination of ALP of international transactions by the A.O.? ITAT states that, the AO’s observation that this expenditure has been debited to the profit and loss account […]
The issue under consideration is whether the penalty notice u/s 271(1)(c) issued to the assessee who has taxed his income as per provision of section 115JB pr 115JC is justified in law?
whether the department is entitled to seize a consignment of perishable goods in transit more particularly when it is accompanied by a lawful e-way bill, invoice and when it has paid the applicable IGST?
In current scenario, every person has dream of entering into stock market and build a healthy and wealthy portfolio. The only thing which restrict them to enter into this is time which is most precious thing in today’s competitive environment. This is mainly because to manage a portfolio is consider as kind of tedious job. […]
The issue under consideration is whether disallowance of relocation expenses u/s 40(a)(i) of the Act and non granting of tax deducted at source with respect to that expense is justified in law?
The issue under consideration is whether goods can be detained merely because IGST applicable is not mentioned in the e-way bill?
In the instant case, the assessee in the year under consideration has claimed an expense under the head prior period item in its profit and loss account. Such prior period item was representing the excise duty with respect to waste i.e. Spent Earth generated during the manufacturing process. The assessee during the assessment proceedings admitted that such expenses pertains to the earlier year but the same is allowable on payment basis under section 43B of the Act.
The issue under consideration is whether where a trust has incurred shortfall due to its excess spending in a particular year, such deficit or shortfall allowed to be c/f in full for set off against the incomes in subsequent years under s.11(1)(a) and Section 11(1)(b) of the Act?
Naresh Kumar Garg Vs ACIT (ITAT Delhi) When the grounds for reopening the reassessment do not exist any longer and no additions were ultimately made on that account, the addition in respect of the other items, which were not part of the ‘ reasons to believe’cannot be made. ITAT states that it is evident that […]
