Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Section 154 can not be applied if a debatable point involved

July 29, 2015 2096 Views 0 comment Print

Mistake apparent on the record u/s 154 must be an obvious and patent mistake and not something which can be established by a long drawn process of reasoning on points on which there may be conceivably two opinions.

Validity of summon order passed by trial court and criminal proceedings u/s 279(1) r.w. section 276D

July 29, 2015 460 Views 0 comment Print

The petitioner by letter dated 17th November, 2011 had disclosed a foreign bank account which existed with the HSBC Private Bank, Geneva, Switzerland to the Director of Income Tax (Investigation-II). The peak amount lying in the said account during the year ending 31st March, 2007 was around US$ 1.3 million.

Failure to supply reasons recorded by AO u/s 148 will make whole assessment proceedings void

July 29, 2015 3673 Views 0 comment Print

It is an admitted fact, in the present case that the Department has failed to supply the assessee the copy of reasons recorded by the Assessing Officer for issuance of notice under Section 148 of the Act. Following the decision of Hon’ble Jurisdictional High Court in Haryana Acrylic Manufacturing Company, the issue was decided in favour of the assessee.

Mere error would not confer jurisdiction to exercise revisional power U/s. 263

July 29, 2015 285 Views 0 comment Print

The condition precedent for exercising the revisional power under section 263 of the Act is that the order under revision should not only be erroneous, but such erroneous order should result in prejudice to the interests of the Revenue.

Penalty u/s 271AAA not justified, if A.O. makes assessment on actual income disclosed u/s 132(4)

July 29, 2015 574 Views 0 comment Print

On this undisclosed income, A.O. vide penalty order, levied penalty of Rs.2.5 crore u/s 271AAA mainly for the reason of non disclosure of the particulars of income in the statement filed u/s 132(4) by the assessee.

Onus to prove Third party documents found during search is on department

July 29, 2015 693 Views 0 comment Print

Document found during search was a third party document which was neither in the handwriting of the assessee nor bears her signature. Its inference has to be taken as stated by the person who possessed the document.

Addition u/s 68 for mere high premium on issue of shares not valid

July 29, 2015 2010 Views 0 comment Print

Whether the assessee company charged a higher premium or not, should not have been the subject matter of the enquiry in the first instance Instead, the issue was whether the amount invested by the share applicants were from legitimate sources.

If remand report given by AO is without any adverse comments then appeal of revenue would be dismissed

July 29, 2015 7241 Views 0 comment Print

ITAT held that CIT(A) had made detailed observations on the remand report of the AO who also in his report had not questioned any of the submissions made by assessee and in fact also had not made any adverse comments on the same.

Transfer Pricing- Companies having abnormal cost cannot be taken as comparable

July 29, 2015 1321 Views 0 comment Print

Assessee had reduced its operating expenses to calculate ratio of operating profit/Total cost which was the base to calculate the value of export of goods in transfer pricing on the basis that it was its first year of operation

In transfer pricing 2 companies can be compared only if they are functionally comparable

July 29, 2015 1576 Views 0 comment Print

Assessee was engaged in the field of providing insurance & Human Resources services to its associated enterprise in UK. The Ld. AO /TPO made an addition to the income of the assessee by comparing the income of the assessee with the income of the comparable companies

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
August 2024
M T W T F S S
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031