Circular No. CIR/CFD/CMD/12/2015 Accordingly, recognized stock exchanges shall use imposition of fines as action of first resort in case of such non compliances and invoke suspension of trading in case of subsequent and consecutive defaults. Accordingly, in order to maintain consistency and uniformity of approach the recognized stock exchanges shall follow the following procedure:
In the case of M/s Kunj Power Project Pvt. Ltd. v/s Union Of India, it was held that the attachment of property and bank accounts can only be done by the revenue authorities after giving proper notice to the assessee and reasonable opportunity of being heard. The attachments needs to be only after following the prescribed procedures provided in the rules.
Subject: Suggestions on the Proposed New CARO for FY 2015-2016 Dear Members The Ministry of Corporate Affairs recently constituted a Committee to formulate the Companies (Auditor’s Report) Order (CARO) to be issued under section 143(11) of the Companies Act, 2013. This aforesaid Order is proposed to be made applicable for audit reports on the financial […]
Recently, it has come to our knowledge that a proposal not allowing Chartered Accountants/ Non- Advocates for practice of law in the course of proceedings before revenue authorities falling in your jurisdiction is under consideration.
Hema Hiren Dand vs. JCIT (ITAT Mumbai) Merely because the assessee liquidates its investment within a short span of time, which had given better overall earning to the assessee, would not lead to the conclusion that the assessee had no intention to keep on the funds as investor in equity shares
CIT Vs. M/s. Indo Arab Air Services (Delhi High Court) Assessee had escaped assessment for the AY in question. While the AO has referred to the fact that the ED gave information regarding cash deposits being found in the books of the Assessee
Loan given to the Directors was not from the borrowed funds. Therefore, interest liability of the assessee towards the Bank on the borrowing which was taken by the assessee had no bearings because otherwise, the assessee had sufficient funds of its own which the assessee could have advanced
DCIT vs. Zuari Estate Development & Investment Co Ltd (Supreme Court) After going through the detailed order passed by the High Court, we find that the main issue which is involved in this case is not at all addressed by the High Court.
The Jurisdictional Commissioners of Income Tax are unable to understand specific applicability of Rule 55 of Income Tax Rules, 1962 in connection/relation with each & every Clause of Subsection (2) of Section 288 of the Income Tax Act, 1961,and are blindly rejecting the applications of aspirants opting to become & be Registered Income Tax Practitioners, under a pretext that though the applicant possess the educational qualifications specified u/s 288(2)(v)/(vi), the applicant has not practiced before the Income Tax Authorities for not less than one year on the date of application
ITAT Delhi held In the case of ACIT vs. M/s Command Detective & Securities Pvt. Ltd. that when all the purchases are accounted in the regular books of accounts, it means the source is explained and the provisions of section 69C are not applicable, as there was no unaccounted expenditure.
