ITO Vs M/s Citizen Scales (I) P. Ltd. (ITAT MUMBAI)-The Assessing Officer imposed penalty u/s 271(1)(c) of the Act. We note that in para 4 of the assessment order it has been categorically recorded that there was a mistake in computation of book profit and the same was pointed out by the Assessing Officer
The assessee in the present case is a Company, which is engaged in the business of trading in jewellery. The return of income for the year under consideration was filed by it on 01.11.2004 declaring a loss of 1,81,69,142/-.
ACIT Vs M/s. Tirupati Enterprises (ITAT KOLKATA) We hold that merely for non-prosecution of original document before the Assessing Officer during the remand proceedings, the transaction per se cannot be doubted with when the Xerox copies with supporting documents were duly furnished before the Assessing Officer.
M/s. Palco Distributors Vs. JCIT (ITAT Kolkata) Only premise of the AO for making addition is that assessee could not produce purchase bills for a sum of Rs.21,72,083/- having 526 items. We find that the items are properly recorded means the assessee has explained the source of acquisition
ITAT Chandigarh held In the case of ACIT vs. Ms. Harjinder Dhiman that time limit for deposit in capital gains scheme is to be taken as due date of filing of return of income u/s 139(4). In the instant case, the sale proceeds were deposited in the capital gains scheme on 05.02.2009
ITAT Delhi held In the case of JDIT vs. Mool Chand Kharaiti Ram Trust that Merely because, running of an Allopathic hospital is not specifically mentioned, it does not necessarily mean that the same would be ultra vires the objects
No. SEBI/LAD-NRO/GN/2015-16/27.─ In exercise of the powers conferred by section 30 of the Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992 (15 of 1992), the Board hereby makes the following regulations to further amend the Securities and Exchange Board of India (Listing Obligations and Disclosure Requirements) Regulations, 2015, namely:-
F. No. 390/CESTAT/69/2014-JC During the recent past there have been certain decisions of the CESTAT wherein cost was imposed either on department or on the adjudicating officer / appellate officers. The cost so imposed was ordered to be paid to the assesse or to the Registry of the Tribunal.
No. SEBI/LAD-NRO/GN/2015-16/026.—In exercise of the powers conferred under section 30 of the Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992 (15 of 1992), the Board hereby makes the following Regulations to further amend the Securities and Exchange Board of India (Substantial Acquisition of Shares and Takeovers) Regulations, 2011, namely:—
The Reserve Bank of India has created a dedicated helpline Email ( [email protected] ) for start-ups in India in order to offer guidance/assistance to them for undertaking cross-border transactions within the ambit of the regulatory framework.
