Analyze the CESTAT Chandigarh order in M R Beltings vs. Commissioner of Central Excise, focusing on the issue of willful suppression and its impact on excise duty demand.
CESTAT set aside demand order and held that, Revenue Department does not have authority of law to collect service tax on services provided by SEZ developer to units in SEZ within SEZ area.
Exploring AAR, West Bengal ruling on Aryan Flour Mills’ wheat crushing service to State Government, which is tax-exempt if goods value is < 25% of supply.
Learn about how Jac Olivol Body Oil was classified under GST in India: GST @ 28% for its primary function of care of skin not cure of skin.
Explore the Kerala High Court ruling in Koduvayur Constructions vs AC-Works Contract case. Understand the significance of GST portal notices and the responsibility of the assessee.
HC held that, that Section 65 (GST Audit by tax authorities) applies only to registered businesses and concluded that authorities cannot conduct audits for businesses that have closed and further clarified that there is no barring in initiating proceeding under Section 73 and 74 of the CGST Act.
CESTAT held that if Value Added Tax (VAT) is paid on goods used in repairs, no service tax can be levied on those goods.
HC set aside SCN and held that assessee was not ‘intermediary’ and therefore, refund claim of unutilized ITC used in making zero rated supplies of services without payment of IGST was allowed.
SC in Gagandeep Singh v. Union of India & Ors. admitted Writ and issued notice to Revenue Department, challenging GST provisions pertaining to power to arrest and power to summon.
Narayani Industry Vs State of Bihar (Patna High Court) The esteemed Patna High Court, in the case of M/s. Narayani Industry v. State of Bihar [Civil Writ Jurisdiction No. 11333 of 2023 dated August 11, 2023], ruled that in instances where a statute prescribes a definite timeframe for the condonation of delay, the Appellate Authority […]
