iscover the implications of Rahul Packaging v. Union of India as Delhi High Court rules on appellate authority jurisdiction in tax matters. Learn more!
The Patna High Court dismissed Rajesh Kumar Dubey’s writ petition against the Union of India, ruling that writ jurisdiction cannot be availed when alternate remedies are not pursued diligently.
Telangana AAR rules ITC claims depend on conditions met, not GSTR-2B auto-population. Learn about the Noori Travels case and its implications.
Allahabad High Court rules interest and penalty not leviable on GST if there’s no fault of the assessee in depositing tax. Learn more about this landmark case.
Paper cups fall under HSN 4823 40 00, attracting 18% GST, as ruled by the AAR, West Bengal. Learn more about the detailed case and implications.
Telangana AAR rules ancillary services like packing and loading with GTA services are not taxed separately if directly linked to transportation.
J&K High Court rules writ petition valid if appellate authority position is vacant, ensuring timely appeals.
CESTAT Chandigarh partly allowed Maruti Suzuki India Ltd.’s appeal against Service Tax demand, highlighting that tax under reverse charge applies when distributors incur reimbursable expenses for the taxable person. Dive into the case and understand the intricacies of the reverse charge mechanism.
In Roshan Sharma v. Assistant Commissioner of Revenue, Calcutta High Court sets aside tax demand, interest, and penalty due to lack of effective opportunity for the Assessee to rebut allegations. Understand the significance of proving movement of goods and services.
Explore the Karnataka High Court’s verdict on the levy of service tax for legal services by advocates and senior advocates under reverse charge. Understand exemptions and implications in this comprehensive analysis.
