Zeeshan Azizmohmed Shaikh Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai) Both SEBI and BSE corroborated the fact that Kailash Auto Finance Ltd was not a genuine company – LTCG exemption u/s 10(38) denied – addition u/s 68 sustained Facts- The assessee is an individual and is engaged in the business of trading in paper. The assessee filed its […]
Arcil CPS 002 XIII Trust Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai) Assessee trust is a Revocable Trust and contribution by beneficiaries is a revocable transfer. Hence, the income shall be taxed in the hands of the beneficiaries. Facts- The assessee is an AOP in the nature of trust in the business of securitization of debts and processing […]
J & K Tourism Development Corporation Ltd. Vs ACIT (ITAT Amritsar) No disallowance can be made that the payment to the employee’s contribution to PF and ESI paid by the assessee before the due date of filing of return of income u/s. 139(1). Accordingly, we hold that no disallowance can be made in the assessment […]
Paramount Probuild Pvt. Ltd. Vs DCIT (ITAT Delhi) Held that when there is no incriminating material was unearthed during the course of search in respect of an issue, then no addition in respect of such an issue can be made in the assessment u/s 153A & 153C of the Act. Facts- The assessee Company is […]
Chirag M. Shah Vs ITO (ITAT Ahmedabad) It is observed that it is crystal clear that there are provisions under the IT Act; namely, section 199 of the IT Act, 1961 and Rule 37BA of the IT Rules, 1962 and the proper mechanism is also provided under the Act and Rules. Thus, respectfully following the […]
Nekkanti Sea Foods Limited Vs PCIT (ITAT Visakhapatnam) That the export entitlements (MEIS) and the duty drawback of promotion scheme is an income asssessable under the head “profits or gains from business or profession” accordingly, eligible for deduction u/s 80IB(11A). Facts- The assessee is engaged in the business of export of frozen shrimp and other […]
Held that M2M loss on SWAP contract was allowable where loans were converted into foreign currency loan to take benefit of low interest rate and loss recognized on account of foreign exchange fluctuation as per notified Accounting Standard 11 was an accrued and subsisting liability and not merely a contingent or hypothetical liability.
Held that as per the identical issue of disallowance of bought note purchases in cash u/s. 40A(3) of the Act for the assessment year 2017-18 and after considering relevant facts, we set aside the issue to the file of the Assessing Officer for further verification.
Madanthyar Primary Agricultural Credit Co-operative Society Vs DCIT (ITAT Bangalore) The notices in question were issued during the covid period and the Assessee’s contention that it could not respond to the notices in view of the pandemic situation has to be accepted as a reasonable cause. Facts- As there was delay in filing TDS statement, […]
ITO Vs Mohammedarif Ibrahimbhai Shaikh (ITAT Ahmedabad) Held that non-issuance of proper show cause can be fatal to the proceeding under the Income Tax Act. AO clearly failed in issuing the appropriate show-cause notice thereby clearly vitiated the principle of natural justice Facts- The assessee is engaged in the business of trading in and export […]
