Delhi High Court held that as appellant have exhausted their appellate remedy and there is no alternate efficacious remedy available to the appellant, the court finds the case fit for exercise of discretionary powers under Article 226.
CESTAT Delhi held that Customs broker is not required obtain any Recommendation or a certificate from any officer that the exporter is bonafide. Accordingly, order alleging violation of regulation 10(n) of CBLR unsustainable.
ITAT Ahmedabad held that assessee has produced many evidences to provide genuineness of the transactions and hence addition confirmed by CIT(A) is liable to be deleted.
ITAT Chennai held that TDS credit of the earlier financial years is available as income relating to said TDS has been offered to tax for the impugned assessment years on the basis of mercantile system of accounting.
Bombay High Court dismissed the writ petition as an alternate remedy of appeal is available to the petitioner which needs to be filed before the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) as per the provisions of Section 246 of the Income Tax Act.
Orissa High Court held that in absence of any power of review, the Tribunal could not have subsequently reconsidered its previous decision and the subsequent order reopening the matter is held to be the illegal, ultra vires and without jurisdiction.
ITAT Hyderabad held that AO has neither made any enquiry nor asked any questions to the assessee nor any information was called for. Therefore, the order passed by AO was erroneous and prejudicial to the interest of revenue within the meaning of section 263 of the Income Tax Act.
ITAT Mumbai held that reopening of assessment was undertaken by AO without application of mind on complete incorrect assumption of fact that no return of income was filed for the relevant Assessment year and hence said reopening of assessment is invalid.
ITAT Kolkata held that advance given in relation to business transaction for setting up hospital project which was abandoned, the said advance is irrecoverable and hence allowable as revenue expenditure.
ITAT Ahmedabad held that the Assessing Officer is required to pass the assessment order within the time limit prescribed under section 153(1) of the Income Tax Act and hence any order passed belatedly is unsustainable in law.
