Case Law Details
Case Name : Madhu Velayudhan Vs ITO (ITAT Hyderabad)
Related Assessment Year : 2015-16
Courts :
All ITAT ITAT Hyderabad
Become a Premium member to Download.
If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Madhu Velayudhan Vs ITO (ITAT Hyderabad)
ITAT Hyderabad held that AO has neither made any enquiry nor asked any questions to the assessee nor any information was called for. Therefore, the order passed by AO was erroneous and prejudicial to the interest of revenue within the meaning of section 263 of the Income Tax Act.
Facts-
PCIT on perusal of record noted that as the assessee kept the purchased plants in the laboratory for further growth under special conditions using chemicals, controlled temperature etc. and thereafter, sold them to the farmers. As such, the income derived from the above ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Kindly Refer to
Privacy Policy &
Complete Terms of Use and Disclaimer.

