Madras High Court held that it is well settled now that carry forward of unadjusted VAT TDS (TNVAT Act) to GST is duly allowed in terms of Section 140 of the TNGST Act, 2017.
ITAT Chandigarh held that AO not empowered to disturb the assessment order/ reassessment order which has attained finality, unless contrary material gathered in the course of proceedings u/s 153A of the Income Tax Act.
ITAT Delhi held that provisions of section 292C of the Income Tax Act is only a deeming provision and the deeming provision cannot be applied mechanically, ignoring the facts of the case and surrounding circumstances.
Madras High Court held that detention of goods for mere non-mentioning of GSTN of the recipient under Bill to – Ship to transaction, without intention to avoid tax, is unjustified.
Delhi High Court held that Corporate Social Responsibility [CSR] expenses incurred by assessee are allowable as deduction under section 37(1) of Income Tax Act.
ITAT Delhi held that as the statutory notice was not served to the correct address, penalty under section 271(1)(b) of the Income Tax Act cannot be levied alleging the non-compliance of the statutory notices.
Gujarat High court held that the dues in the nature of sales tax or VAT payable by the original owner cannot claim priority over the dues of the secured creditor.
Calcutta High Court held that the appellate authority could not have taken a decision on an issue, which did not emanate from the order passed by the original authority.
ITAT Ahmedabad held that addition on account of on-money received @50% is on a palpably very high side. Accordingly, the same is restricted to Gross Profit percentage i.e. 15%.
CESTAT Bangalore held that notification no. 29/2018-CUS dated 01.03.2018 was published in the official gazette only on 06.03.2018 after it was digitally signed. Hence, the said notification is effect only from 06.03.2018 and not from 01.03.2018.
