CESTAT Chennai held that as per Section 73A(2) of the Finance Act, 1994 monies collected as a tax, even if wrongly done, has to be deposited to Government.
CESTAT Ahmedabad held that merely because by an agreement a right is confirmed on the party to the sale of goods or service undertaken was not ipso-facto bringing the agreement within the ambit of the franchisee.
CESTAT Ahmedabad held that reversal of proportionate credit towards exempted goods along with interest already made, the demand of 10% /6%/5% of the value of exempted goods shall not be sustainable
ITAT Mumbai held that change of opinion is not permissible under the garb of reopening of assessment under section 147/148 of the Income Tax Act.
ITAT Bangalore held that payments received towards interconnectivity utility charges from Indian customers / end users cannot be considered as Royalty to be brought to tax in India under section 9(1)(vi) of the Income Tax Act and also as per DTAA.
ITAT Delhi held that as shares were acquired prior to 01.04.2017, gain derived from sale of such equity shares is exempt under Article 13(4) of India-Mauritius DTAA.
Jharkhand High Court held that the explanation inserted in Rule 89 (4) of CGST Rules, 2017 vide Notification No. 14/2022-Central Tax dated 05.07.2022 is not clarificatory in nature and thus will have a prospective effect.
ITAT Surat held that addition under section 56(2)(x) on the Income Tax Act unsustainable as addition made in casual manner without considering payment made on account of various amenities.
ITAT Mumbai held that as Form No. 67 has been filed by the Appellant before the processing the return of income under Section 143(1) of the Income Tax Act, foreign tax credit is duly eligible.
CESTAT Mumbai held that as registration numbers were purposefully omitted, accordingly, the genuineness of the invoices are doubtful, the invoices are categorized as inadmissible document.
