Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Hal Offshore Ltd. Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi)
Related Assessment Year : 2018-19
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Hal Offshore Ltd. Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi) AO treated the assessee as ‘assessee in default’ u/s 201(1)/201(1A) for not deducting TDS of ₹16,80,590 on payments made to Brunvoll AS, Norway for repair and replacement of ship parts. Facts: Assessee paid ₹78,18,744 + ₹29,09,960 to Norwegian vendor for replacing defective parts of its ship. Vendor’s personnel came to India for only 29 days. Vendor had no PE in India. Assessee argued that it was a works contract / sale with incidental installation, therefore Article 7 (Business Profits) of India-Norway DTAA applies, not Article 12 (FTS). Ass...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930