Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : JIT Auto Comp Vs Assistant Commissioner (Madras High Court)
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.

JIT Auto Comp Vs Assistant Commissioner (Madras High Court)

CHENNAI, INDIA – In a significant ruling dated July 8, 2025, the Madras High Court, in the case of M/S. JIT AUTO COMP, REP. BY ITS MANAGING PARTNER K. VELMURUGAN VERSUS ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, HOSUR (W.P. No. 16474 of 2024 & W.M.P. Nos. 18033 & 18034 of 2024), has held that initiating proceedings under Section 74 of the CGST Act, 2017, solely on the grounds of a supplier’s non-submission of a Chartered Accountant (CA) certificate, is unjustified. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

Jyoti Baluni is a practicing Chartered Accountant with specialization in indirect taxes, particularly GST. She has represented clients in Litigation, compliances, classification and valuation disputes and frequently contributes to professional publications. View Full Profile

My Published Posts

SC on GST Refunds: No Refund if Tax Incidence is Passed on 17.02.2026 No Waiver of 10% Pre-Deposit for appealing penalty Even If GST Already Paid: Telangana HC Mandatory Three-Month Gap: Bombay HC Quashes GST Order for Procedural Violation No Fresh Pre-Deposit Required if Initial Deposit Exceeds 20% of Revised GST Demand: Jharkhand HC Allahabad HC Condoned GST Appeal Delay as Time Spent in Rectification Proceedings Excluded Under Limitation Law View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
February 2026
M T W T F S S
 1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
232425262728