This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
ITAT Delhi quashing Levy of penalty u/s 271(1) beyond period of limitation
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Babu Ram Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Related Assessment Year
- 2012-13
- Courts
- All ITAT, ITAT Delhi
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Advertisement
Babu Ram Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi)
Summary: In the case of Babu Ram vs. Income Tax Officer (ITO), the ITAT Delhi addressed the validity of a penalty imposed under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The case originated when the Income Tax Department reopened the assessment of Babu Ram, an individual taxpayer, who had not filed his income tax return despite having taxable income. Subsequently, a notice under Section 148 was issued, prompting him to declare a total income of ₹2,19,408 in response. The Assessing Officer (AO) completed the assessment under Sections 147/143(...





