Advertisement
Advertisement
Skip to content
Follow Us on
Advertisement
TOP STORIES
Income Tax

ITAT Delhi quashing Levy of penalty u/s 271(1) beyond period of limitation

Case Law Details

Case Name
Babu Ram Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi)
Date of Judgement/Order
Only available for paid members
Related Assessment Year
2012-13
Advertisement Babu Ram Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi) Summary: In the case of Babu Ram vs. Income Tax Officer (ITO), the ITAT Delhi addressed the validity of a penalty imposed under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The case originated when the Income Tax Department reopened the assessment of Babu Ram, an individual taxpayer, who had not filed his income tax return despite having taxable income. Subsequently, a notice under Section 148 was issued, prompting him to declare a total income of ₹2,19,408 in response. The Assessing Officer (AO) completed the assessment under Sections 147/143(...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Advertisement

Join TaxGuru's Network for the latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *