This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
ITAT deletes section 69 Additions for deposits duly reflected in Broker Agency’s account
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Kavita Samtani Vs DCIT (ITAT Jaipur)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Related Assessment Year
- 2017-18
- Courts
- All ITAT, ITAT Jaipur
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Kavita Samtani Vs DCIT (ITAT Jaipur)
In a recent judgment, the Jaipur Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) quashed additions made by the Assessing Officer (AO) to the declared income of taxpayer Kavita Samtani for the Assessment Year (AY) 2017-18. The ITAT’s order overturns findings upheld by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) [CIT(A)] in relation to undisclosed transactions and investments, on the grounds of lack of incriminating material.
Case Background
The case centers on undisclosed deposits and investments by Ms. Samtani, which were highlighted during a search and s...



