This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Material imported under MOEF permission cannot be diverted to any other unit: CESTAT Allahabad
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Tinna Rubber & Infrastructure Ltd. Vs Commissioner of Customs (CESTAT Allahabad)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Courts
- All CESTAT, CESTAT Allahabad
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Tinna Rubber & Infrastructure Ltd. Vs Commissioner of Customs (CESTAT Allahabad)
CESTAT Allahabad held that material imported based MOEF permission by a company cannot be diverted to any other unit for any purpose other than one stated in permission letter. Accordingly, goods liable for confiscation u/s. 111(d) of the Customs Act on account of diversion.
Facts- Appellant imported two consignments of old and used cut tiers in 2 & . 3 Pcs. (arisen from old/used tires) for clearance to their Pan pat Unit. These B/Es were assessed and marked for examination with directions to ensure that t...
Author Info
