This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Minor Procedural Lapses not Ground for denying SAD Refund: CESTAT Chennai
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Noritsu India Pvt. Ltd. Vs Principal Commissioner of Customs (CESTAT Chennai)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Courts
- All CESTAT, CESTAT Chennai
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Noritsu India Pvt. Ltd. Vs Principal Commissioner of Customs (CESTAT Chennai)
In the case of Noritsu India Pvt. Ltd. vs. Principal Commissioner of Customs, the Customs, Excise, and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) Chennai held that minor procedural lapses are not sufficient grounds for rejecting a Special Additional Duty (SAD) refund, provided that taxes are fully paid. Noritsu India had imported photofinishing equipment, paying a 4% SAD as per the Customs Tariff Act, 1975. They later applied for a refund under Notification No. 102/2007, presenting all necessary documentation, including...
