This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
IBC Proceedings Don’t Bar liability for bounced Cheque: Madhya Pradesh HC
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Anurodh Mittal Vs Rehat Trading Company (Madhya Pradesh High Court)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Courts
- All High Courts, Madhya Pradesh HC
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Anurodh Mittal Vs Rehat Trading Company (Madhya Pradesh High Court)
In a landmark decision, the Madhya Pradesh High Court ruled in the case of Anurodh Mittal vs. Rehat Trading Company that the initiation of proceedings under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) does not exempt a signatory of a cheque from liability under the Negotiable Instruments Act (NI Act). This verdict clarifies the interplay between insolvency proceedings and criminal liability for cheque dishonor, reinforcing the distinct nature of the two legal frameworks.
Detailed Analysis
The case revolved around Anurodh Mittal, ...
Author Info
