Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Bajrang & Bajrang Vs State Tax Officer (FAC) (Madras High Court)
Appeal Number : W.P. No. 9960 of 2024
Date of Judgement/Order : 16/04/2024
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Bajrang & Bajrang Vs State Tax Officer (FAC) (Madras High Court)

The Madras High Court recently rendered a significant judgment in the case of Bajrang & Bajrang Vs State Tax Officer (FAC). The case revolves around the responsibility of registered individuals to monitor the GST portal and respond to tax demands promptly.

The petitioner challenged an order dated 29.12.2023, alleging a lack of opportunity to contest the tax demand. The petitioner, citing age and health issues, claimed inability to respond to notices or participate in proceedings.

However, the court noted that an audit was conducted, and the petitioner was duly informed through intimation and a show cause notice. Despite this, the petitioner failed to respond with supporting documents, leading to the confirmation of the tax proposal.

While recognizing the petitioner’s circumstances, the court emphasized the registered person’s responsibility to monitor the GST portal. Nonetheless, in the interest of justice, the court remanded the matter, allowing the petitioner to remit 10% of the disputed tax demand and submit a reply within three weeks.

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
August 2024
M T W T F S S
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031