Case Law Details
Presidency Exports & Industries Limited Vs Commissioner of Customs (CESTAT Kolkata)
Introduction: This article examines a crucial order by CESTAT Kolkata in the case of Presidency Exports & Industries Limited vs. Commissioner of Customs. The dispute revolves around the rejection of refund claims based on shipping bill assessments. The appellant challenges the rejection, citing discrepancies in the assessment process and the absence of a final order under Section 17 (5) of the Customs Act, 1962.
Detailed Analysis: The appellant filed three refund claims, arguing that export duty was incorrectly charged based on Wet Metric Tonne (WMT) instead of Dry Metric Tonne (DMT), as per the contract value. The Adjudicating Authority demanded export duty without providing reasons, and the appellant’s request for a speaking order under Section 17 (5) of the Customs Act went unanswered.
The authorities rejected the refund claims, asserting that the shipping bills had undergone final assessment, and no appeal was filed. The appellant, challenging this decision, argued that without a speaking order under Section 17 (5), the assessment remains inconclusive, making the refund claims maintainable.
CESTAT Kolkata reviewed the case and highlighted Section 17 (4) and (5) of the Customs Act. It noted that, as per the Act, the Adjudicating Authority should pass a speaking order on reassessment within 15 days. However, in this instance, no such order was issued. Therefore, CESTAT Kolkata ruled that the reassessment of shipping bills was not final, rendering the denial of refund unsustainable.
Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.
Author Bio
