This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Benefit of Notification 67/1995-CE cannot be denied if appellant is fulfilling requirement of Rule 6 of Cenvat Credit Rules
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Jindal Saw Ltd Vs C.C. E. & S.T.- Rajkot (CESTAT Ahmedabad)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Courts
- All CESTAT, CESTAT Ahmedabad
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Jindal Saw Ltd Vs C.C. E. & S.T.- Rajkot (CESTAT Ahmedabad)
The appellants are engaged in manufacture of iron and steel products. During the process of manufacture, scrap is generated and the same is either used within the factory of production for manufacture of goods or cleared on payment of duty. In so far as the goods are used captively for manufacture of other goods, benefit of Notification 67/1995-CE dated 16.03.1995 has been claimed.
CESTAT find that Notification 67/1995-CE dated 16.03.1995 prescribes exemption for goods captively consumed subject to the condition that the finishe...
