Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Radheyshyam Gupta Vs PCIT-9 (ITAT Kolkata)
Appeal Number : I.T.A. No. 187/KOL/2022
Date of Judgement/Order : 09/09/2022
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Radheyshyam Gupta Vs PCIT-9 (ITAT Kolkata)

ITAT Kolkata held that the transaction of purchase of old gold jewellery in exchange of sale of new jewellery is covered under rule 6DD (d) and hence exempted from the provisions of section 40A(3) of the Income Tax Act. Further, there is no violation of provisions of section 40A(3) as there is no actual transaction of payment of cash.

Facts-

The Ld. PCIT (Principal Commissioner of Income Tax) assuming jurisdiction u/s. 263 of the Act called for assessment records and after examining the same the Ld. PCIT issued the show cause notice mainly alleging that assessee has made cash payment of Rs. 2,24,63,103/- for purchase of old gold jewellery and in terms of section 40A(3) such expenditure is not allowable.

Being aggrieved, the assessee has preferred the present appeal.

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031