Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Jal Engineering Vs Union of India (Gujarat High Court)
Appeal Number : R/Special Civil Application No. 5040 of 2021
Date of Judgement/Order : 16/12/2021
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Jal Engineering Through Partner Karishma Shaikh Vs Union of India Through Secretary (Gujarat High Court)

Facts- The petitioner invokes the extraordinary jurisdiction vested in this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India and seeks direction against the respondents for immediate sanction of the refund of Integrated Goods and Service Tax paid in regard to the goods exported zero rated supplies made vide Shipping Bills. It is averred that the authority has illegally withheld the refund of the petitioner and the e-mail received from ICEGATE stating that since drawback is claimed at a higher rate of refund of the petitioner, the same cannot be sanctioned U/s 54 of the CGST Act read with Section 16 of the IGST.

In present case, the refunds were stuck due to mismatch of invoice and shipping bills and Central Board of Excise Customs (CBEC) vide Circular No.05 of 2018-Customs dated 23.02.2018 provided an alternative mechanism to give exporters an opportunity to rectify such errors committed in the initial stage. It envisaged an officer interface on the Customs EDI System through which the Custom Officer may verify the information furnished in GSTN and Custom EDI system and sanction refund in those cases where detail of invoice provided in GSTR-01/Table 6A are correct.

Conclusion- Held that the refund towards the IGST paid in respect of the goods exported i.e. “zero rated supplies”, vide the shipping bills ought to have been completed as the two circumstances provided in sub clauses (a) & (b) of Clause (4) of Rule 96 of Rules, 2017 do not exist. The shipping bills, as per Rule 96, exporter once file are deemed to be an application for refund of Integrated tax paid on the exports of goods and withholding of the same is made permissible under Rule 96 (4) when read with Section 54 as specified in the decision of Amit Cotton Industries.

FULL TEXT OF THE JUDGMENT/ORDER OF GUJARAT HIGH COURT

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031