Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : M/s. Tata Steel Ltd. &
Appeal Number : Anr Vs State of West Bengal &
Date of Judgement/Order : Ors. (Calcutta High Court)
Related Assessment Year : W.P.A. No. 5306 of 2021
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

M/s. Tata Steel Ltd. & Anr Vs State of West Bengal & Ors. (Calcutta High Court)

Facts- The main issue raised was whether petitioners/purchasing HSD oil dealers who have been denied a refund of excess tax by the Respondent State Government of West Bengal which was admittedly collected by it from the petitioners through the selling oil dealers/IOCL in West Bengal in excess of concessional rate of tax under Section 8 (1) read with Section 8 (3) and 8 (4) of Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 and which were paid under compelling extraordinary circumstances beyond its control of the petitioners, can be called “person aggrieved” and have locus standi to file the instant Writ Petitions.

Conclusion- Held that neither petitioners nor IOCL is guilty of any latches and when there is no specific prohibition under the statute against such refund petitioners should not get entangled in the cobweb of procedures and the State should do substantial justice by refunding the amount of tax in question collected by it in excess of statutory concessional rate of tax during the relevant period either to the selling oil dealers/IOCL or to the purchasing oil dealers/petitioners and State should not deprive the legitimate claim of the petitioners to purchase the HSD oil at a concessional rate which is their statutory right under Central Sales Tax Act, 1956, in course of inter-State sale since they have fulfilled the conditions under Section 8 (1) read with 8 (3) and 8 (4) of the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 by doing what fairness and justice demand of a State and which is the motto of every civilised society.

Impugned order of assessment passed by the Assessing Officer is set aside to the extent of refusal of acceptance of relevant “C” Forms submitted before him during the impugned assessment proceeding by the HSD oil purchasing dealers/petitioners through the oil selling dealers/IOCL relating to the relevant disputed period which was issued by the purchasing respective State Government, in favor of the petitioners on inter-State sales in question and it shall accept the aforesaid relevant “C” Forms and allow the concessional rate of tax to the petitioners on the basis of the said relevant “C” Forms subject to formal verification of the same.

FULL TEXT OF THE JUDGMENT/ORDER OF CALCUTTA HIGH COURT

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
August 2024
M T W T F S S
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031