Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : ITO Vs Shri Udaykumar D. Bhatt (ITAT Ahmedabad)
Appeal Number : ITA No. 2072/AHD/2018
Date of Judgement/Order : 06/08/2021
Related Assessment Year : 2014-2015
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

ITO Vs Shri Udaykumar D. Bhatt (ITAT Ahmedabad)

Section 271(1)(c) cast responsibility upon the AO to reach the clear finding with respect to levy of penalty under the specific charge and if the AO fails to do so then the penalty cannot be levied as such penalty order shall not be maintainable in the eyes of law.

In the light of the above stated discussion, we see the case on hand. It is noticed that the AO in the penalty order has levied the penalty under both the charges i.e. concealment of particulars of income and furnishing inaccurate particulars of income.

Section 271(1)(c) penalty not leviable when AO levied penalty under both charges

The relevant finding of the AO is extracted as under:

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031