Advertisement
Advertisement
Skip to content
Follow Us on
Advertisement
TOP STORIES
Custom Duty

Burden of proof for non-smuggled nature of seized gold lies on assessee

Case Law Details

Case Name
Deepak Handa Vs Principal Commissioner of Customs (Preventive) CESTAT Delhi)
Date of Judgement/Order
Only available for paid members
Advertisement
Deepak Handa VsPrincipal Commissioner of Customs (Preventive) (Delhi CESTAT) Conclusion: Since assessee could not discharge their responsibility of proving non-smuggled nature of the seized foreign marked gold as per section 123 of Customs Act thus, the confiscation of the gold bars, gold coins and small pieces of gold under section 111(d) and section 111(i) was correct. Held: In the instant case, the total gold weighing 15.389 kg estimated to be worth about Rs. 4.6 crores was seized under the Customs Act as Deepak did not have any bills for the gold nor any documents to show that the foreign ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Advertisement

Join TaxGuru's Network for the latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *