Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : National Internet Exchange of India Vs Union of India & Ors. (Delhi High Court)
Appeal Number : W.P.(C) 10795/2020
Date of Judgement/Order : 19/01/2021
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

National Internet Exchange of India Vs Union of India & Ors. (Delhi High Court)

On perusal of the record, it emerges that Petitioner has filed TRAN-1 form within the time prescribed by the Respondents under the rules. Petitioner is holding documents evidencing payment of tax by it on such inputs / input services received under the erstwhile tax regime. It is thus eligible to carry forward the credit from erstwhile tax regime to the GST regime under Section 140 of the CGST Act read with Rule 117 of CGST Rules. Petitioner claims that this error has occurred because of the introduction of new and vastly different tax regime (GST) of which the Petitioner had no prior experience whatsoever, and thus it was new to the filing of Form GST TRAN-1 as well. For the aforesaid bona fide human error, inadvertently, it failed to take into account certain invoices, on which service tax amounting to Rs. 40,36,542/- was not reflected in TRAN-1 Form.

Supreme Court inUnion of India & Ors. v. Adfert Technologies Pvt. Ltd. 2020 SCC OnLine SC 106, has dismissed the SLP filed by the department against the judgment rendered by the Punjab & Haryana High Court. We are satisfied that the difficulty faced by the Petitioner was a genuine one. Due to an inadvertent human error and oversight on the part of the Petitioner, its substantive right should not be denied. Petitioner should therefore not be precluded from having its claim examined by the authorities in accordance with law.

 In view of the aforesaid decisions, we have no hesitation in allowing the request of the Petitioner and accordingly the present petition is allowed. The Respondents are directed to open the online portal so as to enable the Petitioner to re-file the rectified TRAN-1 form electronically, or, accept the same manually with the corrections within a period of three weeks from today. Petitioner’s claim shall thereafter be processed in accordance with law and Respondents shall be at liberty to verify the genuineness of the claim of the Petitioner. The Petitioner shall thereafter be permitted to correspondingly revise Form TRAN-2.

FULL TEXT OF THE JUDGMENT/ORDER OF DELHI HIGH COURT

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031