Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : CTM Technical Textiles Ltd Vs Union of India (Gujarat High Court)
Appeal Number : Special Civil Application No. 8332 of 2020
Date of Judgement/Order : 24/12/2020
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

CTM Technical Textiles Ltd Vs Union of India (Gujarat High Court)

Both the goods in question are being manufactured by the writ-applicants by weaving; it being warp knitting in case of the Agro Shade Net and weaving by warp and weft in case of the Geo Grid fabrics. Both these commodities are in the nature of fabrics, and the respondents have also accepted the fact that the Agro Shade Net are fabrics manufactured on the Raschel knitting machine, whereas the Geo Grid fabrics are woven fabrics manufactured on the weaving machines.

The judgment in Raj Pack Well Ltd. (supra) relied upon on behalf of the respondents has nothing to do with the HDPE fab­ric, but it relates to the HDPE strips/tapes/sacks. The question whether fabric woven out of strips or tapes are textile products or not, was not involved in this judgment. The contention raised by the writ-applicants is that the woven fabric would be ‘textile’ irrespective of the method of weaving through any technique and the materials used for weaving may also be anything like cotton, silk, rayon, nylon or any other description or made out of any other material; but when any such material is woven into fabric, what comes into existence is a “textile”.

A specific and categorical submission was raised by the writ-applicants before the authorities that similarly situated manufacturers located elsewhere in the State as well as in the country have classified similar products as textiles, and the Cen­tral Excise officers have not initiated any proceedings against them on the basis that the goods are articles of plastics charge­able to excise duty. In the representations made before the Chief Commissioner, the Ministry of Finance and the Principal Chief Commissioner as well as the jurisdictional Commissioner, the writ-applicant has submitted as under :-

“It may be noted sir that more than 100 manufacturers in the country are treating this product as a Textile material and following HSN code under chapter 60. We understand that we are the only company who have the Show cause Notice pending.”

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031