Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Soham Securities Ltd. Vs ITO (ITAT Ahmedabad)
Appeal Number : ITA No. 2208/Ahd/2015
Date of Judgement/Order : 02/11/2018
Related Assessment Year : 2011-12
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Soham Securities Ltd. Vs ITO (ITAT Ahmedabad)

Conclusion: Interest income earned by assessee engaged in money lending in a systematic manner had to be taxed as business income in spite of the fact that assessee was not having registration with RBI as NBFC.

Held: Assessee in the instant case had shown interest income under the head income from other sources on the advice of the consultant. As such, it was advised to assessee that it could not carry out money lending business in a systematic manner without having approval from the RBI as NBFC. Therefore, assessee classified interest income as income under the head from other sources. Assessee had claimed several expenses for running its money lending activity which were classified under the head business and profession. Consequently, there was income under the head income from other sources but there was loss under the head business and profession. Accordingly, AO held that assessee was not entitled to claim the set off of the loss shown under the head business and profession against the income from other sources on the ground that there was no business activity. It was held assessee has been carrying on the business of money lending in a systematic manner without having the registration with RBI as NBFC. Merely, the fact that assessee was not registered with RBI as NBFC, could not lead to draw an inference that assessee was not carrying out business activity. The registration with RBI as NBFC and business activity of the assessee, both were different aspects and could not be applied for holding that the assessee was not engaged in the business activity. Thus, the interest income of assessee should have been treated as income from business and profession.

FULL TEXT OF THE ITAT JUDGEMENT

These are cross appeals against each other have been filed at the instance of the Assessee and revenue against the appellate order of the Learned Commissioner of Income-Tax (Appeals)-2, Vadodara [“CIT(A)” in short] dated 22.05.2015 relevant to Assessment Year 2011-12.

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031