Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Singhania Foundation Education Trust Vs. DDIT (ITAT Kolkata)
Appeal Number : ITA No. 1368/Kol/2016
Date of Judgement/Order : 29/11/2017
Related Assessment Year : 2010- 11
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Singhania Foundation Education Trust Vs. DDIT (ITAT Kolkata)

Assessing Officer denied the exemption under section 11 of the Act, based on the reason that income of Rs. 22,83,087/- of Singhania Foundation Education Trust (in brief ‘Trust’) was transferred to Singhania Foundation Education Samity (in brief ‘Samity’) for mutual benefit and both have a common key person namely Shri D.C. Singhania who have substantial interest in both, that is, in ‘Trust’ as well as in ‘Samity’. The AO also noted that facts and circumstances of the case is not coming within the exceptional circumstances provided in the provisions of section 13(1) (c) of the Act. Another stand taken by the Assessing Officer to deny the exemption under section 11 of the Act was that the said amount of Rs. 22,83,087/- was directly deposited in the bank account of the various persons without routing through assessee’s Trust accounts, that is, the said money was routed through separate organizations namely, International Legal Consultants Ltd. and Law Firm Management Services Ltd( LFMS).

We note that ld.CIT(A) took a different stand to deny the exemption which was not arising out of the assessment order passed by Assessing Officer under section 143(3)/11 of the Act. The ld CIT(A) held that in case of assessee trust under consideration, the explanation below sub-section (2) of Section 11 are applicable, as the trust made payments to a university approved under section 10(23C)(vi), therefore, there cannot be claim of deduction at both ends, that is, an application by the assessee and as income by the recipient. Therefore, CIT(A) held that such payments should not be treated as application of income as per explanation of section 11(2), and this way, he denied the exemption.

We note that as per submissions of ld DR for the Revenue, the basic information were not available on record such as:

(i) Property from which the rental income of the trust has derived, that is rental agreement and assessee`s Trust entitlement to receive rental income.

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031