Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : M/s.Manaksia Ltd. Vs Commissioner of Central Excise, Haldia (CESTAT Kolkata)
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
There is no bar in amended Section 35F of the Central Excise Act, 1944, that the deposit has to be made in cash only and not from CENVAT Credit Account. CESTAT held that view taken by the First Appellate Authority, that deposit under Section 35F (i)  cannot be made from CENVAT Credit Account, is not the correct appreciation of law so long as the CENVAT Credit is  permissible for utilisation as per Rule 3(4) of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004. RELEVANT EXTRACT OF THE JUDGMENT This appeal has been filed by the appellant against Order-in-Appeal No. 09/HAL/2016 dated 15.02.2016 passed by the Commi...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
May 2026
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031