Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Sabith K. A Vs Commercial Tax Officer (Kerala High Court)
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sub section (2) of Section 42 of the Kerala Value Added Tax Act, 2003 requires the dealer to file a revised annual return, rectifying the mistake or omission along with the audit certificate; none of which has been done by the petitioner. The e-mail said to have been sent by the petitioner to the Commercial Tax Officer, is not a proper mode of applying for revision, as statutorily prescribed. Relevant Extract of the Judgment The petitioner is aggrieved with Ext.P1 order of assessment passed against the petitioner and the estimation made in the said order. The petitioner’s contention is b...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930