P A Chacko Muthalaly Vs ACIT (ITAT Mumbai)- If the approvals of the technical services have not been granted, obviously then assessee is not entitled for deduction u/s.80RRA. The Tribunal cannot go beyond its scope to hold that CBDT was not correct in refusing the permission for which assessee could have taken appropriate steps before the Honourable High Court. In the light of this discussion we are of the view that assessee is not entitle for deduction u/s.80 RRA.
P.A. Chacko Muthalaly Vs ACIT
ITAT Mumbai
I.T.A. No.: 6242/Mum/2009
Assessment Year: 2002- 03
&
I.T.A. No.: 6243/Mum/2009
Assessment Year: 2004- 05
ORDER
Per T.R. Sood (AM):
These appeals filed by the assessee are directed against the order dated 18.09.2009 of Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-32, Mumbai and relates to the assessment years 2002-03 and 2004-05.
2. In both these appeals identical grounds have been raised through which the following two disputes have been raised:-
“1. Confirmation of the rejection of the claim of deduction u/s. 80RRA of Rs. 8,48, 155/-.
2. Rejection of the alternate claim of deductions u/s. 80(0).”
3. After hearing both the parties we find that assessee who is an Electronic Engineer and expert in Lazer Technology has rendered some technical services to the foreign parties and claimed deduction u/s.80 RRA. The deduction was denied by the AO because assessee had not fulfilled the condition as per section 80 RRA, sub section (2), clause (ii).





