Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : CCE (ST) Vs. 1. M/s. EID Parry 2.M/s. Audco India Ltd. 3.M/s. K.H. Arind Ltd [CESTAT Chennai]
Appeal Number : Appeal No. S/70 & 71/2007 and S/93 & 94/2007
Date of Judgement/Order : 06/04/2009
Related Assessment Year :
Sponsored

Demands on Indian companies for tax on services of BAS received from persons abroad – held that “it is only after enactment of Section 66A that taxable services received from abroad by a person belonging to India are taxed in the hands of the Indian residents – Since Section 66A was introduced on 18.4.2006 much after the material period, the impugned order had to be sustained – revenue’s appeal rejected

IN THE CUSTOMS, EXCISE & SERVICE TAX

APPELLATE TRIBUNAL SOUTH ZONAL BENCH AT CHENNAI

 Appeal No. S/70 & 71/2007 and S/93 & 94/2007

 (Arising out of Orders-in-Appeal No. 20 to 23/2007 (M-III) dated 28.2.2007 passed by the Commissioner of Central Excise (Appeals), Chennai)

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031