Case Law Details
ORAL JUDGEMENT
(PER DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD, J.) :
The appeal by the Revenue raises the following substantial questions of law:
“a) Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, the Tribunal was justified in holding that, only the profit element of the sale of DEPB that is the amount in excess of sale proceeds over the face value is covered u/s. 28(iiid) and not the entire amount received on sale of DEPB entitlements represents profits chargeable under Section 28(iiid) of the Income Tax Act, 1961;
b) Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, the Tribunal was erred in holding that the entire amount received on sale of DEPB entitlement does not represent profit chargeable u/s.28(iiid) of the Act;
Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.