Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : CIT Vs King Metal Works (Bombay High Court)
Appeal Number : ITA (L) No. 801 of 2010
Date of Judgement/Order : 07/07/2010
Related Assessment Year :
Sponsored

ORAL JUDGEMENT

(PER DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD, J.) :

The appeal by the Revenue raises the following substantial questions of law:

“a) Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, the Tribunal was justified in holding that, only the profit element of the sale of DEPB that is the amount in excess of sale proceeds over the face value is covered u/s. 28(iiid) and not the entire amount received on sale of DEPB entitlements represents profits chargeable under Section 28(iiid) of the Income Tax Act, 1961;

b) Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, the Tribunal was erred in holding that the entire amount received on sale of DEPB entitlement does not represent profit chargeable u/s.28(iiid) of the Act;

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031