This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Penalty can not be imposed u/s. 272A(2)(c) for delay in filing of quarterly returns of TDS
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Royal Metal Printers Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Add. CIT (ITAT Mumbai)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Courts
- All ITAT, ITAT Mumbai
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
RELEVANT PARAGRAPH
7.We have heard the rival submissions and carefully perused the record. Admittedly tax was deducted at source and payment was made/ deposited within the time provided under the Act and the returns under Form 26Q as well as 24Q were filed with a marginal delay, reckoned from the due date for filing the regular returns as per the old provisions of the Act. It is also not in dispute that for the immediately preceding year also there was a delay in filing the quarterly statements but the Assessing Officer has not initiated penalty proceedings.
8. Section 273B of the Act provides...
