Advertisement
Advertisement
Skip to content
Follow Us on
Advertisement
TOP STORIES
Income Tax

Unexplained investment addition of ₹12.30 Cr deleted – Funds for software project proved; Rule 46A objection rejected – ITAT Delhi

Case Law Details

Case Name
ITO Vs Prem Softech Private Ltd. (ITAT Delhi)
Date of Judgement/Order
Only available for paid members
Related Assessment Year
2014-15
Advertisement
ITO Vs Prem Softech Private Ltd. (ITAT Delhi) In ITO vs Prem Softech Pvt. Ltd. (A.Y. 2014-15), the AO treated ₹12.30 crore invested in mutual funds as unexplained investment u/s 69 and also estimated income on contractual receipts after reopening assessment u/s 147. The CIT(A) deleted the addition after examining bank statements, mutual fund records and financials of Prem Power Construction Pvt. Ltd., which showed that funds were received for software development and later returned in the same year. Before the ITAT, the Revenue argued violation of Rule 46A and lack of creditworthiness of the...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Advertisement

Author Info

CA Vijayakumar Shetty
Qualification: CA in Practice
Company: Shetty & Co, Chartered Accountants, Mangalore
Location: Mangalore, Karnataka
Articles Published: 5,525

Join TaxGuru's Network for the latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *