Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Shyam Gopal Vs DCIT (ITAT Delhi)
Related Assessment Year : 2013-14
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Shyam Gopal Vs DCIT (ITAT Delhi) ITAT Delhi allowed the assessee’s appeal for AY 2013-14 in Shyam Gopal, quashing the entire reassessment and ₹5.48 crore capital-gain addition purely on limitation, without going into merits. The Tribunal held that the notice u/s 148 dated 20-07-2022 (issued post-Ashish Agarwal) was hopelessly time-barred when tested against the law laid down by the Supreme Court in Union of India v. Rajeev Bansal. Applying the exact timeline computation (TOLA extension, deemed 148A(b) notice, response period and surviving days), the Bench found that the last permissible da...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930